Study on the qualitative and/or quantitative perception of the Delphi method in educational research

Authors

  • Miguel Cruz Ramírez Universidad de Holguín. Cuba
  • Mayelín Caridad Martínez Cepena Universidad de Holguín. Cuba
  • Osvaldo Jesús Rojas Velázquez Universidad Antonio Nariño. Colombia.

Keywords:

Delphi method; perception; subjective distance; qualitative research; quantitative research; mixed methods; educational research

Abstract

The growing implementation of the Delphi method in the field of educational research motivated the study of its perception towards the qualitative, the quantitative, or the mixed. From a sample of 80 researchers, a positioning of this method was observed slightly towards the quantitative, although less than the statistical and experimental methods, and more than the structured surveys. A multivariate technique of data reduction allowed us to identify four underlying factors that explain the causes, incident to the perceptual process: degree of formalization, mode of organization, level of abstraction, and empirical/theoretical relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asselin, M., & Harper, M. (2014). Revisiting the Delphi technique. Implications for nursing professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 30, (1), 11-15. doi: 10.1097/01.NND.0000434028.30432.34
Bowles, N. (1999). The Delphi technique. Nursing Standard. 13, (45), 32-36. doi: 10.7748/ns1999.07.13.45.32.c2650
Cruz, M. (2009). El Método Delphi en las Investigaciones Educacionales. La Habana: Academia.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, (3), 458-467. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Fletcher, A. J., & Marchildon, G. P. (2014). Using the Delphi method for qualitative, participatory action research in health leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 1-18. doi: 10.1177/160940691401300101
Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Sensation and Perception (9th ed.). Belmore, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78, (9), 1695-1704. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
Helmer, O., & Rescher, N. (1958). On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation Paper P-1513. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/2005/P1513.pdf
Jones, L. E. (1983). Multidimensional models of social perception, cognition, and behavior. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, (4), 451-472. doi: 10.1177/014662168300700405
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, (2), 112-133. doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224
Kaplan, A., Skogstad, A. L., & Girshick, M. A. (1950). The prediction of social and technological events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14, (1), 93-110. doi: 10.1086/266153
Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & Mckenna, H. (2011). The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lahey, B. B. (1986). Psychology. An Introduction. Iowa, CA: WCB.
Landeta, J. (1999). El Método Delphi: Una Técnica de Previsión para la Incertidumbre. Barcelona: Ariel.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18, (4), 423-436. doi: 10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, (4), 376-382. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, (4), 353-375. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7

Published

2018-04-02

How to Cite

Cruz Ramírez, M., Martínez Cepena, M. C., & Rojas Velázquez, O. J. (2018). Study on the qualitative and/or quantitative perception of the Delphi method in educational research. LUZ, 17(2), 3-13. Retrieved from https://luz.uho.edu.cu/index.php/luz/article/view/903