Questionnaire to Diagnose Interactivity in Distance Education from the Students' Perception
Keywords:
student; distance education; interaction; instrumentAbstract
The objective of this article was to describe the stages to design and validate a questionnaire aimed at diagnosing interactivity in distance education from the students' perception. The instrument formed by one dimension, three indicators and 55 items was subjected to the psychometric tests of validity and reliability. The validity was evaluated through the Delphi technique using 17 experts who, with their criteria, helped enrich the instrument. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha using a sample of 381 distance race students, obtaining a result of 0.850 indicating stability, guarantee and quality in the responses. As a final result, a valid and reliable questionnaire was obtained that allowed us to diagnose the state of interactivity from the students' vision and on this basis propose improvement actions so that the Learning Teaching Process in distance education is successful.
Downloads
References
Aparic, R., & Silva, M. (1 de marzo de 2012). Pedagogía de la interactividad. Comunicar. Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Comunicación y Educación, 19(38): 51-58. https://doi.org/10.3916/c38-2012-02-05
Barroso, O. J., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2010). La investigación educativa en TIC. Visiones Prácticas. Madrid: Síntesis.
Barroso, O. J., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: El coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(2): 22-38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4): 281–302
García-Aretio, L. (2014). Bases, mediaciones y futuro de la educación a distancia en la sociedad digital. Madrid: Síntesis.
García-Aretio, L. (2019). El problema del abandono en estudios a distancia. Respuestas desde el Diálogo Didáctico Mediado. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1): 245-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22433
Hernández-Godoy, V.; Fernández-Morales, K. y Pulido, J. (2018). La actitud hacia la educación en línea en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2): 349-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.277451
Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (February, 2017). Type and degree of co-occurrence of the educational communication in a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1): 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1114498
Huss, J. A., Sela, O., & Eastep, S. (2015). A Case Study of Online Instructors and Their Quest for Greater Interactivity in Their Courses: Overcoming the Distance in Distance Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (4). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.5
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Fernández-Collado, C. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. (Sexta Edic). México: McGraw-Hil.
Junus, K., Suhartanto, H., Hartati R-Suradijono, S., Budi Santoso, H. & Sadita, L. (2019). The community of inquiry model training using the cognitive apprenticeship approach to improve students’ learning strategy in the asynchronous discussion forum. Journal of Educators Online, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.7
Kitto, K., Williams, C., & Alderman, L. (2019). Beyond Average: Contemporary statistical techniques for analysing student evaluations of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3): 338-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1506909
Leis, M., Schmidt K, & Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2015). Using the Partial Credit Model to Evaluate the Student Engagement in Mathematics Scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(3): 251-267.
López-Gómez, E. (2018). El método delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XX1, 21(1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.15536
Mauri, T., Onrubia, J., Coll, C., & Colomina, R. (15 de julio de 2016). La calidad de los contenidos educativos reutilizables: diseño, usabilidad y prácticas de uso. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, (50). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/50/8
Muir, T., Milthorpe, N., Stone, C., Dyment, J., Hopwood, B., Muir, T., … Freeman, E. (2019). Chronicling engagement: student’ experience of online learning over time. Distance Education, 40(2): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600367
Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. R. (2010). Fiabilidad y validez. Papel Del Psicólogo, 31(1): 67–74. https://bit.ly/2NIUroA
Ramírez, R. B., Guerrero, J. I. M., & Cabrero, B. G. (2015). Validación de una escala de interacción en contextos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, (17): 116-129. https://doi.org/org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i49.03
Song, D., Rice, M., & Oh, E. Y. (2019). Participation in Online Courses and Interaction With a Virtual Agent. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3998
Thongsawat, S., Davidson-Shivers, G., & Chatphoomiphong, B. (2019). Designing an Interactive Student Orientation to Build Social Connectedness. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 28(1): 99-112. https://bit.ly/2rj34P3
Zangara, M. A. (2017). Interacción e interactividad en el trabajo colaborativo mediado por tecnología informática. (Tesis de doctorado). Universidad Nacional de la Plata, Argentina. https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/67175
Zhu, M., Herring, S. C., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Education, 40(2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365









