Absurd verbal complexes as a kind of phraseological units
Keywords:
absurd verbal complexes, paremiological units, phraseological unitsAbstract
The article describes phraseological units with absurd semantics that are presented in cognitive linguistics as models for analyzing phraseological units and metaphors that do not have frontal descriptive power. Special attention is paid to the internal form of absurd constructions of phraseological units, which requires a distinctive attitude towards the concept of the internal form of logically "correct" and logically "incorrect" categories. It was determined that the construction of the internal form of absurd constructions presupposes the obligatory interaction of three "correlative" systems: a) false unity b) representation of images, c) understanding and consciousness. The linguistic-cognitive model of describing absurd constructions necessarily includes all the described structures (concept, internal form, linguistic image of the world, nominative and interpretive field), although they are not strictly limited to these.
Downloads
References
Bally, C. (2001). An Essay on Stylistics. Editorial Board of the USSR.
Baranov, A.N. & Dobrovolsky, D.O. (2013). Fundamentals of phraseology (short course). Flint: Science.
Brezolin, A. (2023). Brief analysis of nonsense stock witticisms in Brazilian portuguese. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 6(3), https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i3.416
Christiansen, M.H., Kallens, P.C. & Trecca, F. (2022). We need a comparative approach to language acquisition: A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022). First Language, 42(6), 751–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221093847
Dobrovolsky, D.O. & Karaulov, Yu.N. (1994). Associative Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language.
Gérard, J. (1982). La sémantique des phrases absurdes. Semiotica,39(3–4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1982.39.3-4.285
Gozalova, M.R., Gazilov, M.G. & Abdulkadirov, U.U. (2022). A comparative study of Caucasian languages. Revista EntreLínguas,8(1), e022015–e022015. https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v8iesp.1.16926
Goranko, V. (2021). How Deontic Logic Ought to Be: Towards a Many-Sorted Framework for Normative Reasoning. In Fenrong Liu, Alessandra Marra, Paul Portner, & Frederik Van De Putte (Eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. 15th International Conference, DEON 2020 (pp. 219–238). College Publications.
Huang, C.R. & Yao, Y. (2015). Corpus Linguistics. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (pp. 949–953). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.52004-2
Pimenova, M.V. (2004). Soul and Spirit: Features of Conceptualization. KemSU Publishing House.
Popova, Z.D. & Sternin, I. A. (2010). Cognitive Linguistics. (pp.15- 113). AST East-West.
Potebnya, A. A. (1976). Aesthetics and Poetics. (pp. 131-147). Iskusstvo.
Sanders, T. & Sanders, J. (2006). Text and Text Analysis. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition) (pp. 597–607). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00557-5
Singh, R.(2007). Assertability constraints and absurd assertions. https://carleton.ca/singhr/wp-content/uploads/singh-assertability.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LUZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
